DISMISSED! Royal reporters reveal all after Prince Harry's legal case | Palace Confidential

By Palace Confidential

Community Score: 50% | 72.9K views | 1w

0 community ratings: null thumbs up, null thumbs down

Prince Harry was among a group of high-profile individuals who claimed Associated Newspapers, the publishers of the Daily Mail and Palace Confidential, used illegal newsgathering methods between 2001 and 2013. A number of Palace Confidential royal experts were witnesses in the case, which is why we haven’t been able to talk about it… until now. Today, all 97 claims were dismissed in an ‘overwhelming victory’ for the Mail in a case that many said should never have come to trial. On this bonus episode of Palace Confidential, Richard Kay and Charlotte Griffiths share what it was REALLY like testifying in the High Court and reveal the 'fundamental flaw' in Prince Harry's legal action. Sign up for the Palace Confidential Newsletter here: https://bit.ly/PalaceConfidentialNewsletter #princeharry #royalfamily #royals

Tags: Prince Harry, daily mail royals, daily mail royal family, royal family, meghan markle prince harry, meghan markle daily mail, royals news, royal family news, prince harry news, harry and meghan, royal expert reaction, king charles coronation, king charles, prince harry, frogmore cottage, king charles iii, palace confidential, meghan markle, meghan, kate middleton