Prince Harry Vs Daily Mail Case Should Never Have Made It To Court | Jim Armitage

By Times News

Community Score: 50% | 13.9K views | 3d

0 community ratings: null thumbs up, null thumbs down

“My suspicion is that the lawyers had had so much success in persuading newspaper groups to settle out of court that they just figured they'd kind of bluff and bluff and bluff and would end up making Associated settle out of court.” An unsuccessful case against Daily Mail owners, Associated Newspapers, on behalf of Prince Harry and other high-profile claimants was “badly conducted”, and the money paid in compensation could be a story “almost as big” as the case itself, says The Sunday Times’ contributing editor Jim Armitage. Jim Armitage was speaking to Salma El Wardany and Calum Macdonald on Times Radio Breakfast, and Dominic Ponsford was speaking to Adam Boulton. Listen live every day. Read the best of our journalism: https://www.thetimes.com/ Listen live to Times Radio: https://www.thetimes.com/radio/live Subscribe to The Times and The Sunday Times YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=timesonlinevideo Find us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/

Tags: the times, the sunday times, daily mail, court case, prince harry, media law