Oh look. Anthropic’s AI models also broke containment.
Community Score: 50% | 4 views | 1w
0 community ratings: null thumbs up, null thumbs down
Explore the podcast → https://ibm.biz/~jDjLVwwSn Last week, OpenAI’s models broke out of their sandboxes to cause chaos. This week, it’s Anthropic’s turn. On this episode of Security Intelligence, Diego Matos Martins, Kimmie Farrington and Jeff Crume join host Matt Kosinski to discuss the results of Anthropic’s internal review of testing procedures following the Hugging Face incident last month. Anthropic uncovered three instances of Claude models escaping containment and hacking real companies during what were supposed to be simulations. Granted, that’s three incidents out of 141,000 reviewed tests, which raises the question: Just how big a deal is this really? Then, we talk about research from Zenity into PleaseFix, a class of vulnerabilities that affects every agentic browser on the market. Zenity’s take: In the rush toward agentic functionality, these tools stripped away decades’ worth of browser security fundamentals. Finally, a so-called “security researcher” has a publ
Tags: IBM, IBM Cloud
More from IBM Technology
- Cybersecurity Architecture: Five Principles to Follow (and One to Avoid) — Score: 50%
- What is Multimodal RAG? Unlocking LLMs with Vector Databases — Score: 50%
- AI Privilege Escalation: Agentic Identity & Prompt Injection Risks — Score: 50%
- Better Instructions, Better AI Results — Score: 50%
- Copilot usage reveals AI adoption patterns — Score: 50%
- Claude Opus 4.6 Security Risks — Score: 50%