Neuroscientists Have Been Misreading Brain Scans for Decades
Community Score: 50% | 15.4K views | 4d
0 community ratings: null thumbs up, null thumbs down
For 72 hours, enjoy 15% OFF on all Hoverpens with code SABINE, or click on the link https://noviumdesign.shop/sabine - Free shipping to most countries. Also on Amazon: https://noviumdesign.shop/jTAp1f Neuroscientists have long assumed that when a brain region becomes more active, more blood flows to it. That assumption is the entire basis of functional magnetic resonance imaging. A new paper now says it's wrong for about 40% of the signals, and it isn't the only recent study to find that a lot of what we thought we knew about the brain rests on bad measurements. Let's take a look. #science #neuroscience #sciencenews #brain #health πT-shirts, mugs, posters and more: β https://sabines-store.dashery.com/ π Support me on Donorbox β https://donorbox.org/swtg π Transcript with links to references on Patreon β https://www.patreon.com/Sabine π Transcripts and written news on Substack β https://sciencewtg.substack.com/ π© Free weekly science newsletter β https://sabinehossenfelder.com/
Tags: hossenfelder, science with sabine, science humour, replication crisis, reproducibility crisis, questionable research practices, underpowered studies, false positives, publication bias, junk science, bad statistics, research misconduct, neuroimaging, brain scan, blood oxygen level dependent, BOLD signal, cognitive neuroscience, fmri
More from Sabine Hossenfelder
- Ageing is reversible -- in glass, physicists find | Science News β Score: 50%
- This Calculation Could Change The Periodic Table β Score: 50%
- US Military Uses βGhost Murmursβ in Iran: What are they? β Score: 50%
- The Dark Matter Mystery Just Took a Weird Turn β Score: 50%
- Quantum Computers Just Got Much More Dangerous β Score: 50%
- It's not that string theory failed -- it's worse β Score: 50%