"Absolutely Ridiculous!" | Andy Burnham Insists Social Security Over National Security

By TalkTV

Community Score: 50% | 3.3K views | 1mo

0 community ratings: null thumbs up, null thumbs down

National security “can’t come at the expense of social security”, the Prime Minister has insisted, as he criticised Tory plans to fund defence. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch used Andy Burnham’s second Prime Minister’s Questions to question whether the Government would reach 3% for defence funding by 2030, insisting there were “serious threats to national security that cannot wait”. Mr Burnham hit back, insisting the Conservatives’ plan to fund defence by cutting housing benefits would create mass homelessness. Speaking with International Editor Isabel Oakeshott, Talk's Jeremy Kyle says: "Well, they won't wise up to it. They will bankrupt this country. And in three years or whenever it is, everybody will go, why the hell did we let them have power?" #andyburnham #labour #jeremykyle #talk Have you got a story? Email tips@talk.tv Click here for more from Talk https://talk.tv If you need any help visit: https://talk.tv/helplines

Tags: talkradio, talk radio, news, uk, politics, debate, free speech, freedom of expression, talk tv, live, live news, talktv live, talk tv live, talktv, Andy Burnham Gerald Ratner moment social security, Andy Burnham national security priorities criticised, Isabel Oakeshott Talk International Editor interview, welfare spending 330 billion pounds breakdown, defence spending 3% GDP 15 billion needed, council special needs child 30000 pounds week