The Case Against Flock
Community Score: 50% | 371.3K views | 1mo
0 community ratings: null thumbs up, null thumbs down
DONATE to the Institute For Justice: https://ij.org/support/give-now/thecivilrightslawyer/ The government is claiming that Flock keeps us safe; that it solves crime; that it saves children; and that it’s completely constitutional. But is it? Michael Soyfer is an attorney with the Institute for Justice who is leading the two major lawsuits currently pending that challenge the constitutionality of these flock camera networks. He explains why this sort of mass surveillance is unconstitutional, and also how you can help join the fight. Because the real battle isn’t on social media - it’s the one currently being fought in the Courts. And that takes money. Plate Privacy Project: https://plateprivacy.com Michael Soyfer: https://ij.org/staff/michael-soyfer/ Norfolk lawsuit: https://ij.org/case/norfolk-virginia-camera-surveillance/ San Jose lawsuit: https://ij.org/ll/challenging-the-plate-reader-panopticon-from-coast-to-coast/ Video to submit? https://forms.gle/HmwnDQKvwvYPxe967 Submissions
More from The Civil Rights Lawyer
- Wildlife Cops Arrest Innocent Hunter, Steal His Truck — Score: 50%
- Cops Bang on Guy's Door, Refuse to Leave — Score: 50%
- Cop Who Shot HeeHaw the Donkey Just Got Sued — Score: 50%
- Couple Accused of Trespassing (on their OWN property) — Score: 50%
- Cops Demand Woman’s Ring Video at 3AM (without a warrant) — Score: 50%
- Why You Shouldn't Trust the Police... (Man Dies After Cop's Typo) — Score: 50%