Are AI labs ignoring cybersecurity experts?
Community Score: 50% | 3 views | 3w
0 community ratings: null thumbs up, null thumbs down
Visit Security Intelligence podcast page to get more security content → https://ibm.biz/~UfIWYEqFs Last week, some of the biggest names in AI coalesced around the need to pace development and strengthen security measures. Problem is, many of the biggest names in cybersecurity feel like they haven’t been invited to that conversation. On episode 52 of Security Intelligence, Jeff Crume, Nikki Robinson and Omari Jones join hosts Matt Kosinski and Patrick Austin to talk about the rising tensions between frontier labs and cybersecurity pros. The former seem to be approaching AI safety as primarily an issue of alignment, while the latter thinks a few good old-fashioned security controls could go a long, long way. Then: Just as the frontier labs are locking their models down, their open-weight counterparts are letting people pull off sophisticated hacks—like hijacking TikTok users’ cameras—with relative ease. Should open models play a bigger role in our security conversations? Finally, CI
Tags: IBM
More from IBM Technology
- Cybersecurity Architecture: Five Principles to Follow (and One to Avoid) — Score: 50%
- What is Multimodal RAG? Unlocking LLMs with Vector Databases — Score: 50%
- AI Privilege Escalation: Agentic Identity & Prompt Injection Risks — Score: 50%
- Better Instructions, Better AI Results — Score: 50%
- Copilot usage reveals AI adoption patterns — Score: 50%
- Claude Opus 4.6 Security Risks — Score: 50%