Will it take a disaster to force AI regulation? | The Economist

By The Economist

Community Score: 50% | 7.3K views | 6d

0 community ratings: null thumbs up, null thumbs down

Donald Trump, until recently, has taken a hands-off approach to regulating artificial intelligence. The president has favoured boosting the stock market and ensuring that America beats China in the AI race. But that strategy is becoming unsustainable. Americans are increasingly anxious about everything from data centres to job security, while incidents of agents going rogue are warnings for the catastrophes that could lie ahead. With anti-AI sentiment growing, and the midterms fast approaching, the Trump administration may have to reassess how AI should be regulated. Edward Carr, The Economist’s deputy editor, and Zanny Minton Beddoes, editor-in-chief, are joined by a panel of experts to discuss how to strike the right balance between safety and speed. #AI #China #USA #Technology 00:00 - “The Chernobyl of AI” 00:16 - China v America: would embracing regulation mean falling behind? 03:38 - How to get regulation just right 05:18 - How American states are taking regulation into th

Tags: News, Current Affairs, The Economist, AI regulation, artificial intelligence, AI safety, AI risk, Chernobyl of AI, human extinction, AI race, technology regulation, AI policy, Industrial Revolution, AI governance, future of AI, tech policy, AI debate, AI catastrophe, technology, AI

More from The Economist

  • Doping in sport: why it can't be stopped — Score: 50%
  • America’s massive military build-up near Iran | The Economist — Score: 50%
  • What would be the point of an American strike on Iran? | The Economist — Score: 50%
  • Do old people own too many stocks? | The Economist — Score: 50%
  • Why Elon Musk wants to put data centres into space | The Economist — Score: 50%
  • How “El Mencho’s” death could reshape Mexico’s largest cartel | The Economist — Score: 50%